He would have had to have actually downloaded the 88 gigabytes of data across the Atlantic ocean if Guccifer 2.0 was responsible for the hack. Speeds of 22.7 megabytes per second are unrealistically quickly even for domestic downloads, never ever mind downloads throughout oceans. Rather, download speeds of 22.7 megabytes per second are standard for USB-2 flash drives.
Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), an association of former intelligence and national security specialists, are calling into question the authorities “Russiagate” narrative, inning accordance with the Left-leaning publication The Nation. Four intelligence and computer system specialists tasked with analyzing the case now conclude that the Democrat National Committee (DNC) email server was not hacked by the Russian government. In reality, the server was not hacked at all.
Inning accordance with a groundbreaking and under-reported article released earlier this month by The Nation, there has been no meaningful evidence provided hence far to conclude that Russian associated hackers were responsible for the July 5th, 2016 hack of the DNC server.
The extremely certified experts at VIPS cast doubt on this missive. Particularly, they point to the lack of proof in assistance of the main narrative, and the mounting proof that suggests no hack ever happened. Instead, all openly offered information suggests that the data was downloaded in your area to a USB memory stick, and not downloaded by the Guccifer 2.0 hacker based in Romania.
In addition, the VIPS specialists argue that the intelligence firms erred by not analyzing the Guccifer 2.0 character, who they claim might be a stooge created by the Democrat Party in an effort to manage the story.
The main narrative presented by the Democrat Party and multiple American intelligence firms concluded that the Russian federal government effectively hacked into the DNC server last summer. The world learned of the first hack on June 12th, 2016, when WikiLeaks creator Julian Assange stated that he had sensitive info from Hillary Clinton’s presidential project and would release it to the general public.
The author of The Nation article points out that the only scientific proof provided so far contradicts the official Russian hacking story. Basically, the choices are to either accept the word of the leaders in the intelligence community, or accept the proof collected by former members of the exact same community.
Guccifer 2.0 released a picture of the full leakage when he initially reared his head on June 15th, 2016. Right away, analysis of these posts exposed Russian metadata, nevertheless, under close assessment, these Russian finger prints seem included at a later date. The files published by Guccifer 2.0 were just ‘copied and pasted’ into a text editor with Russian language settings.
The first significant piece of proof against the official narrative is the impractical speed of a trans-Atlantic download. “A speed of 22.7 megabytes is simply unobtainable, especially if we are discussing a transoceanic information transfer,” described a VIPS expert. “Based on the data we now have, what we’ve been calling a hack is difficult.”
The DNC openly admitted that they were the victim of a hack on June 14th. Crowdstrike, a personal cyber security business employed by the DNC, concluded on the 14th that Russia was behind the hack. The next day, an unknown hacker using the moniker “Guccifer 2.0” declared responsibility for the hack and revealed his strategies to leakage the files to WikiLeaks.
The mainstream media will not touch this. If they did it would show disastrous for them!
Article by ScreenHoopla.com